I've been following the Supreme Court's review of President Obama's health care law. They are set to make a ruling this month, either repealing the entire thing or portions of it. As I read the news articles on this topic, I've noticed that they all focus on one primary thing - profit. They look at each scenario and discuss who profits and who doesn't, essentially, who "wins" and who "loses." Funny how we are talking about corporations here, and not people. How do the people "win" and "lose" in regards to the most precious thing given to all of us; our health and livelihood? Without that, we have nothing. What about the individual's profits and losses? What happened to the role of people in this equation? Here's a brief outline of the sections of the article I just read, titled "How Stocks will Fare in Court Ruling on Health Law:"
THE COURT THROWS OUT THE INDIVIDUAL MANDATE BUT KEEPS THE REST OF LAW
Hospitals could find themselves in the sick ward.
THE COURT REPEALS THE INDIVIDUAL MANDATE AND THE NEW COVERAGE RULES
Insurers would win.
THE COURT REPEALS THE ENTIRE LAW
Insurers focused on Medicaid recipients could lose.
THE COURT KEEPS THE LAW
In a sense, health care companies, and their investors, win.
http://www.9news.com/money/273998/344/How-stocks-will-fare-in-court-ruling-on-health-law
It is all focused on profit. Nothing like feeling as though my health means nothing and is simply a commodity for someone at the top to make money off of. I realize this article is specifically focused on how the decision on the law will effect stocks. It just makes me angry that access to health care in this country is not a given right to every single citizen, and that it is not equal. We are all a part of the human family, all we have is our life and our health and that we are denied access to health care in this country is absolutely absurd. This is the only industrialized nation who does not offer health coverage to all of its citizens.
Voting this law down will only make us go backwards again. Why wouldn't the American public want to be covered if they have a preexisting condition? Why wouldn't we want our young population and college graduates to remain on their parents' policies until they are 26, while they establish their careers and find coverage on their own? I am always reading about people who disagree so much with Obama's health care plan. Yet, it helps millions of people get access to coverage! It treats ill people as equals to healthy people! I know it requires everyone to get coverage, but it also provides a lot of assistance to those who can't afford it. Obama's plan isn't flawless and I can understand why some people want to make their own decision as to whether or not they are covered, but the rest of us should also be able to get coverage if we want it, and right now that is not an option for many of us either.
A win-win would be to allow those who don't want coverage to decline it and for those who do to have access to it. Why is this so complicated? I guess because eventually, those who are not covered end up needing care and hospitals foot the bill. It all goes back to money and profit, though. If health care was available to everyone, this wouldn't be an issue. We can spend trillions on war, but we can't find a way to make sure every American has basic health care coverage? And it all comes down to profit. Fuck money and big greedy corporations. I belong on a different planet where they don't exist...a place where health and well-being is the top priority, not money, profit and power.
It is all focused on profit. Nothing like feeling as though my health means nothing and is simply a commodity for someone at the top to make money off of. I realize this article is specifically focused on how the decision on the law will effect stocks. It just makes me angry that access to health care in this country is not a given right to every single citizen, and that it is not equal. We are all a part of the human family, all we have is our life and our health and that we are denied access to health care in this country is absolutely absurd. This is the only industrialized nation who does not offer health coverage to all of its citizens.
Voting this law down will only make us go backwards again. Why wouldn't the American public want to be covered if they have a preexisting condition? Why wouldn't we want our young population and college graduates to remain on their parents' policies until they are 26, while they establish their careers and find coverage on their own? I am always reading about people who disagree so much with Obama's health care plan. Yet, it helps millions of people get access to coverage! It treats ill people as equals to healthy people! I know it requires everyone to get coverage, but it also provides a lot of assistance to those who can't afford it. Obama's plan isn't flawless and I can understand why some people want to make their own decision as to whether or not they are covered, but the rest of us should also be able to get coverage if we want it, and right now that is not an option for many of us either.
A win-win would be to allow those who don't want coverage to decline it and for those who do to have access to it. Why is this so complicated? I guess because eventually, those who are not covered end up needing care and hospitals foot the bill. It all goes back to money and profit, though. If health care was available to everyone, this wouldn't be an issue. We can spend trillions on war, but we can't find a way to make sure every American has basic health care coverage? And it all comes down to profit. Fuck money and big greedy corporations. I belong on a different planet where they don't exist...a place where health and well-being is the top priority, not money, profit and power.
"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace."
Good post
ReplyDelete